Menu
Denial Poster

Denial

The whole world knows the Holocaust happened. Now she needs to prove it.
2016 | 109m | English

(24635 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 1 (history)

Details

Acclaimed writer and historian Deborah E. Lipstadt must battle for historical truth to prove the Holocaust actually occurred when David Irving, a renowned denier, sues her for libel.
Release Date: Sep 30, 2016
Director: Mick Jackson
Writer: David Hare, Deborah Lipstadt
Genres: Drama, History
Keywords london, england, based on novel or book, holocaust (shoah), kraków, poland, auschwitz-birkenau concentration camp, court case, biography, based on true story, courtroom drama, holocaust (shoah) denial
Production Companies BBC Film, Participant, Krasnoff / Foster Entertainment, Shoebox Films
Box Office Revenue: $4,100,000
Budget: $10,000,000
Updates Updated: Feb 01, 2025
Entered: Apr 13, 2024
Trailers and Extras

International Posters

More Like This

Full Credits

Name Character
Rachel Weisz Deborah Lipstadt
Tom Wilkinson Richard Rampton
Timothy Spall David Irving
Andrew Scott Anthony Julius
Jack Lowden James Libson
Caren Pistorius Laura Tyler
Alex Jennings Sir Charles Gray
Harriet Walter Vera Reich
Mark Gatiss Professor Robert Jan van der Pelt
John Sessions Prof. Richard Evans
Nikki Amuka-Bird Libby Holbrook
Pip Carter Anthony Forbes-Watson
Jackie Clune Heather Rogers
Will Attenborough Thomas Skelton Robinson
Max Befort Nik Wachsman
Daniel Cerqueira Sam Glass
Laurel Lefkow Storm Glass
Elliot Levey Roger Levy
Helen Bradbury Rachel Levy
Jacob Krichefski Rabbi Brenner
Abigail Cruttenden Janine Stone
Hilton McRae Judge John Trench
Andrea Deck Leonie
Lachele Carl Gloria
Edward Franklin Simon
Sally Messham Meg
Sean Power Mitch
Tom Clarke Hill Sam Dixon
Amber Batty Kate Kelland
Paul Hunter Judge's Clerk
Amanda Lawrence Court Usher
Ziggy Heath Gerald
Todd Boyce Reporter
Sara Powell Reporter
Nicholas Tennant Angry Man
Jeremy Paxman Himself (Archive Footage)
Paul Bailey Paralegal #1 (uncredited)
Laura Evelyn Maureen
Ian Bartholomew TV Historian
Name Job
Mick Jackson Director
Odile Dicks-Mireaux Costume Design
Haris Zambarloukos Director of Photography
Dixie Chassay Casting
Patrick Malone Digital Intermediate
Lucy Scarfe Stand In
David Hare Screenplay
James O'Donnell Stunt Coordinator
Christina Moore Supervising Art Director
Deborah Lipstadt Book
Lisa Chugg Set Decoration
Roy Chapman Property Master
Dan Lowe Gaffer
Stamos Triantafyllos Steadicam Operator
Isabella Odoffin Casting Associate
James Sizemore Music Editor
Richard Morrison Title Designer
Balendu Kurup Visual Effects Coordinator
Colin Gorry Special Effects Supervisor
Andy Shelley Dialogue Editor, ADR Editor
Dafydd Archard Sound Re-Recording Mixer
Rob Farris Digital Intermediate
William Blunden First Assistant Editor
Julian Spencer Stunt Coordinator
Andrew McAlpine Production Design
Kira Kemble Assistant Art Director
Tomasz Nowak Camera Operator
Hamish Doyne-Ditmas Second Unit Director of Photography
Ava Jade Morgan Casting Assistant
Graham Sutton Music Editor
Kim Armitage Script Supervisor
Devendra Keni Visual Effects Coordinator
Richard R. Reed Visual Effects Supervisor
Bill Higley ADR & Dubbing
Ishbel Beeson ADR & Dubbing
Lucy Willis Makeup Artist
Shaun Richards Digital Intermediate
Luke Redgrave Camera Operator
James Smith-Pryor Rigging Gaffer
Vanessa Baker ADR Voice Casting
Holly Smart Costume Supervisor
Maggie Rodford Music Supervisor
Pranay Agarwal 2D Supervisor
Fay McConkey Visual Effects Producer
Simon Diggins ADR & Dubbing
Marese Langan Makeup Department Head
Susan Hegarty Dialect Coach
Justine Wright Editor
Andy Smart Stunts
Howard Shore Original Music Composer
Jack Stew Foley Artist
Joy Travis Makeup Artist
Peter Gleaves ADR Mixer
Tim Cavagin Sound
Name Title
Jeff Skoll Executive Producer
Jonathan King Executive Producer
Russ Krasnoff Producer
Guy Heeley Executive Producer
Celia Duval Co-Producer
Gary Foster Producer
Joe Oppenheimer Executive Producer
Andrew Karpen Executive Producer
Christine Langan Executive Producer
Organization Category Person
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 21 31 13
2024 5 20 33 12
2024 6 15 27 9
2024 7 20 36 9
2024 8 13 26 8
2024 9 13 26 7
2024 10 11 19 6
2024 11 11 19 6
2024 12 11 16 7
2025 1 15 23 8
2025 2 9 16 3
2025 3 5 13 1
2025 4 2 7 1
2025 5 2 7 1
2025 6 2 4 1
2025 7 1 2 1
2025 8 1 2 1
2025 9 3 4 1
2025 10 1 1 0

Trending Position


Year Month High Avg
2025 1 416 682
Year Month High Avg
2024 11 732 732

Return to Top

Reviews

Rangan
7.0

**A courtroom drama about who's right and who's wrong!** There are many factors to consider, especially for a film like this. Yep, the film was based on the real courtroom event. The film is about two people to prove they're right on their book about the war crimes whether that took place or not. ... So all the episodes take place in a British high court with mention of Auschwitz concentration camp, particularly about its ruins than the events that happened in there. That means it's a great drama to learn about how these two fought in a lawsuit face-off, but there's nothing about the real event just like the film 'The Eichmann Show'. If you are not a Jew or a neo nazi or not even a European and North American, then this is an okayish film from the entertainment aspect, other than learning truth and history. I really expected some real events, but we have already seen in many films about Auschwitz camp. So they kept this film as a modern day court trial than mixing up with those old crime. Great acting by all. Timothy Spall nailed it in his negative role. He was just a fine supporting actor, till I started to recognise him since his genius display in a biopic, 'Mr. Turner'. This is his one of the top performances. He could play Don Trump in his biopic, beside Rob Redford who's a bit old for that. Rachel Weisz was okay. Her role was not strong enough, despite she's in the main character. Because everyone around her took the honour to rise above hers. Be it Tom Wilkinson, who was surprisingly awesome. So in my perspective the film was good, but not great. The courtroom events lacked strong hold with what a film needs and what the viewers wants with twists and turns in the argument. But I'm very happy being honest than modifying its story to make film commercial worthy. Though the film had some its own moments, in the end it was not enough. Particularly how it concludes and to think why this trial even took place makes no sense at all. Seems more a joke than anything serious, just because of someone being crazily challenging and the other one responding to it. Anyway, it's still largely a sensitive matter and my view is just as an outsider. But the film is worth a watch, if you are not expecting a bigger picture after reading its synopsis. _7/10_

May 16, 2024