Menu
Proof Poster

Proof

The biggest risk in life is not taking one.
2005 | 101m | English

(47167 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 2 (history)

Details

Catherine is a woman in her late twenties who is strongly devoted to her father, Robert, a brilliant and well-known mathematician whose grip on reality is beginning to slip away. As Robert descends into madness, Catherine begins to wonder if she may have inherited her father's mental illness along with his mathematical genius.
Release Date: Sep 05, 2005
Director: John Madden
Writer: David Auburn, Rebecca Miller
Genres: Drama, Mystery
Keywords mathematician, paranoia, dementia, proof, notebook, mathematics, campus, grief, university, illness, mental illness, paper, disturbed, death of a loved one
Production Companies Miramax, Endgame Entertainment, Hart-Sharp Entertainment
Box Office Revenue: $7,535,331
Budget: $20,000,000
Updates Updated: Aug 04, 2025 (Update)
Entered: Apr 13, 2024
Trailers and Extras

International Posters

Full Credits

Name Character
Gwyneth Paltrow Catherine Llewellyn
Anthony Hopkins Robert Llewellyn
Jake Gyllenhaal Harold 'Hal' Dobbs
Hope Davis Claire Llewellyn
Danny McCarthy Cop
Tobiasz Daszkiewicz Limo Driver
Gary Houston Professor Barrow
Leigh Zimmerman Friend at Party
Colin Stinton Theoretical Physicist
Leland Burnett Band Vocalist
John Keefe University Friend
Chipo Chung University Friend
C. Gerod Harris University Friend
Roshan Seth Professor Bhandari
Anne Wittman Friend at Party
Lolly Susi Airport Check-In Lady
Name Job
Alice Normington Production Design
Kim Armitage Script Supervisor
Keith Slote Art Direction
Billy Hopkins Casting
Nicola Clarke Hair Department Head
Charmian Adams Supervising Art Director
Nyree Pinder Music Supervisor
Peter Lindsay Production Sound Mixer
Rebecca Gatrell Music Supervisor
Bruce Bigg Property Master
Chris Baron Musician
Mick Audsley Editor
David Auburn Theatre Play, Screenplay
Rebecca Lafford Makeup Department Head
Barbara Herman-Skelding Set Decoration
Kerry Barden Casting
Charlotte Sewell Costume Supervisor
David Pinnington Location Manager
Mark Auguste Supervising Sound Editor
Bill Kaye Still Photographer
Sam Auguste Foley Editor
John Madden Director
Alwin H. Küchler Director of Photography
Suzanne Smith Crowley Casting
Jill Taylor Costume Design
Rebecca Miller Screenplay
Becky Bentham Music Supervisor
Tracey Lee Makeup Artist
Ruth Sullivan Foley Artist
Tim Cavagin Sound Re-Recording Mixer
Daniel Laurie Dialogue Editor, ADR Editor
Olly Tellett Focus Puller
Stephen Warbeck Original Music Composer
Name Title
John N. Hart Producer
Jeffrey Sharp Producer
Julie Goldstein Executive Producer
Robert Kessel Producer
Alison Owen Producer
Bob Weinstein Executive Producer
Harvey Weinstein Executive Producer
James D. Stern Executive Producer
Organization Category Person
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 20 42 10
2024 5 18 25 12
2024 6 17 25 8
2024 7 20 32 11
2024 8 14 24 9
2024 9 10 15 6
2024 10 12 26 8
2024 11 12 24 8
2024 12 10 14 8
2025 1 13 25 8
2025 2 10 15 3
2025 3 5 12 1
2025 4 2 5 1
2025 5 1 5 1
2025 6 1 4 1
2025 7 1 2 0
2025 8 1 2 1

Trending Position


No trending metrics available.

Return to Top

Reviews

tmdb28039023
6.0

Math is an exact science. A mathematical proof is a demonstration of this exactness. Math can also be, according to those who study it, beautiful – an art form even; in that sense, Proof is an aptly titled film in which mathematics overlaps with metaphysics, poetry and even faith. Proof knows its ... characters’ field well enough to have a little fun with it (a character and his math department buddies have a band, and once of their songs is called “i”, as in ‘imaginary number;’ “They just stand there. They don't play anything for three minutes.”); on the other hand, it assumes at times, not entirely without reason, ignorance on the part of the audience. Now, I’ll confess that I didn’t know what a Germain prime was, but the characters do, so it’s a bit of awkward exposition when one explains it to another. Other than this, director John Madden truly lucked out with this movie – which is not to say he didn’t have anything at all to do with the success of the material –; in addition to being based on a Pulitzer Prize-winning play, you simply can’t go wrong when you only have four characters and three of them are played by Hopkins, Gyllenhaal, and Paltrow.

Sep 03, 2022
Geronimo1967
6.0

This film quite succinctly sums up the characteristics of it's principal character. At times it's potent and at others it's a mess. It's all about "Catherine" (Gwyneth Paltrow) who together with her sister "Claire" (Hope Davis) are the daughters of acclaimed mathematician "Robert" (Sir Anthony Hopki ... ns). Now he was borderline obsessed, in a clinical fashion, with his work writing a proof that will profoundly redefine thinking amongst his scientific community. Thing is, he's dead now and seems determined to "haunt" the life of his just as determined daughter (Paltrow) who, herself, treads a very thin line between reality and fantasy. Matters are exacerbated when one of his star pupils "Hal" (Jake Gyllenhaal) asks to look through their late father's papers and discovers something of monumental importance. Who wrote this, though - father or child or both? As the intensity grows for both sisters, their mental stability and their relationship is severely tested whilst the observing "Hal" (now the boyfriend of "Catherine") looks on somewhat dazed and confused as to what to do next as the narrative becomes increasingly peppered with historical familial flashbacks. Paltrow manages quite well with what must have been a difficult part and Davis does likewise as the loving sister who does not/did not share the all-consuming compulsion of her sibling and her dad. Some of the scenes between the two quite compellingly illustrate just how frustrations were growing as 'Catherine" seems bent on a slippery slope to depression. Gyllenhaal hasn't very much to work with and isn't really much more than eye candy and with the odd intervention from Sir Anthony adding little meat to the bones, there's not really enough to hold the film together consistently. It relies too much on the emotionally turbulent aspects of their persona and fails to deliver well on the rationale of their fixation. Just what is this proof and what does it mean to ordinary people - a question frequently asked by "Claire", too.

Jul 17, 2024