Menu
Koyaanisqatsi Poster

Koyaanisqatsi

Life out of balance
1983 | 86m | English

(43901 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 4 (history)

Details

Takes us to locations all around the US and shows us the heavy toll that modern technology is having on humans and the earth. The visual tone poem contains neither dialogue nor a vocalized narration: its tone is set by the juxtaposition of images and the exceptional music by Philip Glass.
Release Date: Apr 27, 1983
Director: Godfrey Reggio
Writer: Godfrey Reggio, Ron Fricke, Alton Walpole, Michael Hoenig
Genres: Drama, Documentary
Keywords technology, civilization, human vs nature, rural area, social commentary, nature run amok, nature, environment, environmental destruction, lost civilization, observational cinema, environmental disaster, nature documentary, man vs nature, environmental catastrophe, observational documentary, poetic documentary, environmental documentary, human in nature, independent film, no dialogue, dying civilization, environmental collapse, environmentally-themed
Production Companies American Zoetrope, IRE Productions, Santa Fe Institute for Regional Education
Box Office Revenue: $3,200,000
Budget: $600,000
Updates Updated: Feb 01, 2025
Entered: Apr 13, 2024
Trailers and Extras

International Posters

Full Credits

Name Character
Ed Asner Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Pat Benatar Self (archive footage) (uncredited)
Jerry Brown Self - On TV (archive footage, uncredited)
Johnny Carson Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Dick Cavett Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Marilyn Chambers Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Sammy Davis Jr. Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Lou Dobbs Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Thomas Dolby Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Linda Ellerbee Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Jerry Falwell Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Mark J. Goodman Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Ted Koppel Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Peter Sellers Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Bill Tush Self - On TV (archive footage) (uncredited)
Name Job
Godfrey Reggio Screenplay, Director
Ron Fricke Screenplay, Director of Photography, Editor
Philip Glass Music, Original Music Composer
Randy Thom Sound Effects
Jacques Ellul Idea
Guy Debord Idea
Louie Schwartzberg Additional Photography
Alton Walpole Screenplay, Editor
Gary Burritt Negative Cutter
David Monongye Idea
Leopold Kohr Idea
Dean Alatzas Grip
David Brownlow Assistant Camera
Hillary Harris Additional Photography
Robert Hill Assistant Camera
Wayne V. McGee Still Photographer
Mark Muich Grip
Michael Hoenig Screenplay
Steve Maslow Sound Re-Recording Mixer
Ivan Illich Idea
Neil Bockman Assistant Camera
Phillip Harrington Still Photographer
Roy Hememnez Grip
Karl Kernberger Still Photographer
Roger McNew Assistant Camera
Robert Palmer Grip
Christine Gibson Additional Photography
Name Title
Godfrey Reggio Producer
Francis Ford Coppola Executive Producer
Roger McNew Associate Producer
Lawrence Taub Associate Producer
Mel Lawrence Associate Producer
T. Michael Powers Associate Producer
Alton Walpole Associate Producer
Organization Category Person
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 17 33 11
2024 5 23 47 13
2024 6 21 33 10
2024 7 22 37 12
2024 8 21 50 13
2024 9 14 21 11
2024 10 13 22 7
2024 11 13 39 7
2024 12 13 25 9
2025 1 13 25 8
2025 2 10 19 3
2025 3 5 15 1
2025 4 1 3 1
2025 5 1 2 1
2025 6 1 2 1
2025 7 1 2 1
2025 8 1 2 0
2025 9 1 3 1
2025 10 3 4 2

Trending Position


No trending metrics available.

Return to Top

Reviews

narrator56
5.0

This is an art film of sorts, eschewing dialogue or narration or a recognizable plot for a visual and musical banquet of images and scenes. So if you are into art films (or want to appear like you are), this is the film for you. The photographic techniques remind me of nature films, which may not ... be a coincidence since the subject matter seems to Focus on what is seen as being against nature. So it is all here: explosions and collapsing of buildings, a bridge, about five times, even what looked like a nuclear blast; then time lapse photography of city and highway traffic and masses of people walking; plus slow motion clips of masses of people walking; and shots of tenements and abandoned building and kids playing in water from fire hydrants — well, you get the idea. I like Philip Glass’s music, but there were times I didn’t think what they used quite fit what was being shown on the screen. But like he apparently told the producers more than once before they convinced him to take it on, movie scores weren’t his thing. So as the William Hurt character says in The Big Chill, just let the art flow over you. If nothing else, check out the dress and hair styles of folks in the wacky 1980s!

Jun 23, 2021
FilipeManuelNeto
1.0

**For the general public, this film is uninteresting. However, it will have merits if displayed within the most correct context.** I've heard of this film as a documentary, but I honestly don't know if Godfrey Reggio really wanted to document anything. This was the director's debut, and for a fir ... st work we can say that there is quality, even though it is a somewhat strange film because it has nothing more than a soundtrack and successive images, which do not seem to have a relationship with each other. If this is an experimental film, I also can't understand what this director really wanted to experiment with. Making a film without a script and without a story? Honestly, this film looks a lot like those successive images that are sometimes shown in waiting rooms, for whoever is sitting there. And what about the film's title? I honestly thought it was some Croatian or Balkan film before I read something about the film and ventured out to see it. Only then did I discover that it was a term from the Hopi language, and that it means living in an unbalanced way. Without a defined script, without any actor, without a spoken word (the title is sung in a threatening Gregorian tone at the beginning and at the end, but I consider this part of the soundtrack pure and simple), we just see all the images and the sound of the music. In short, the film seems like a mute critique of the modern way of life, in contrast to what was lived in the past, before industrialization. It's what I think. And a good movie? It will be good as an introduction to the environmental debate, as a reflection film. For the general public who are not interested in debating these issues, it is not worth it.

Oct 06, 2023