Menu
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Poster

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

The world's greatest actor in a tremendous story of man at his best and worst!
1920 | 79m | English

(6503 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 1 (history)

Details

A doctor's research into the roots of evil turns him into a hideous depraved fiend.
Release Date: Mar 18, 1920
Director: John S. Robertson
Writer: Robert Louis Stevenson, Clara Beranger, Oscar Wilde
Genres: Science Fiction, Drama, Horror
Keywords double life, transformation, alter ego, silent film, jekyll and hyde, torment
Production Companies Famous Players-Lasky Corporation
Box Office Revenue: $0
Budget: $0
Updates Updated: Jul 30, 2025
Entered: Apr 13, 2024
Trailers and Extras

International Posters

Full Credits

Name Character
John Barrymore Dr. Henry Jekyll / Mr. Edward Hyde
Brandon Hurst Sir George Carewe
Martha Mansfield Millicent Carewe
Charles Lane Dr. Richard Lanyon
Cecil Clovelly Edward Enfield
Nita Naldi Miss Gina
Louis Wolheim Music Hall Proprietor
Alma Aiken Extra (uncredited)
J. Malcolm Dunn John Utterson (uncredited)
Ferdinand Gottschalk Old Man at Table in Music Hall (uncredited)
Julia Hurley Hyde's Landlady with Lamp (uncredited)
Jack McHugh Street Kid - Raises Fist to Mr. Hyde (uncredited)
Georgie Drew Mendum Patron in Music Hall (uncredited)
Blanche Ring Woman at Table with Old Man in Music Hall (uncredited)
May Robson Prostitute at Clinic (uncredited)
George Stevens Jekyll's Butler Poole (uncredited)
Edgard Varèse Policeman (uncredited)
Name Job
John S. Robertson Director
Robert Louis Stevenson Novel
Roy F. Overbaugh Director of Photography
Clark Robinson Art Direction
Charles O. Seessel Set Decoration
Thomas Russell Sullivan Theatre Play
Karl Malkames Negative Cutter
Shaw Lovett Assistant Director
Robert M. Haas Set Designer
Clara Beranger Scenario Writer, Screenplay
William Cameron Menzies Art Direction
Oscar Wilde Novel
Name Title
Adolph Zukor Producer
Organization Category Person
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 12 19 8
2024 5 12 19 8
2024 6 13 24 6
2024 7 15 26 8
2024 8 14 24 8
2024 9 9 13 5
2024 10 12 28 6
2024 11 11 30 6
2024 12 9 11 6
2025 1 9 13 6
2025 2 9 15 3
2025 3 5 16 1
2025 4 2 4 1
2025 5 1 4 1
2025 6 2 4 1
2025 7 1 3 0
2025 8 1 3 0
2025 9 2 2 1
2025 10 2 2 1

Trending Position


No trending metrics available.

Return to Top

Reviews

talisencrw
8.0

A very good early silent with both exquisite direction and a fine acting performance by John Barrymore. Well-worth checking out for cinephiles with a heightened interest in the origins of American horror cinema. ...

Jun 23, 2021
Geronimo1967
7.0

I'd have to admit that John Barrymore was certainly no oil painting. Unlike so many silent-era film stars, he could actually act, rather then just look longingly into the camera and/or the gal's doey eyes. Here he portrays Robert Louis Stevenson's eponymous characters with quite some menace and skil ... l. The story of the eminently respectable "Jekyll" who is fascinated by the human psyche and who experiments with mind/body altering drugs, discovering his inner and pretty unpleasant id in "Mr Hyde" in the process. There now follows a battle royal between the two personalities, the decent and the monstrous, and it rapidly becomes unsafe for those around him - including "Millicent" (Martha Mansfield), whom "Jekyll" loves, and even music hall girl "Gina" (Nita Naldi), the object of the desires of his alter ego. Barrymore is great, here - though some of his transformation scenes did remind me of a rather crazed Richard III playing an invisible piano. Using some dark and dingy locations, the clever use of shadow and Barrymore's own ability to create a considerable sense of menace, this really does have the hairs on the back of your neck paying attention. The visual effects are effective and John Robertson gives us a good solid, adaptation of an eerie, provocative story that still captures the imagination now, but without the characterisations being compromised or overly relying on CGI and the like to distract us from the on-screen antics. Whilst I wouldn't say it was the best - the 1931 version was a cracker too, it is one of those stories that resonates now, as it did then, and this is a terrific interpretation.

Jun 06, 2022