Menu
Winchester Poster

Winchester

Terror is building.
2018 | 100m | English

(38772 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 5 (history)

Details

San Jose, California, 1906. Isolated in her labyrinthine mansion, eccentric firearm heiress Sarah Winchester believes that she is being haunted by the souls of those killed by the guns manufactured by her company.
Release Date: Feb 02, 2018
Director: Michael Spierig, Peter Spierig
Writer: Tom Vaughan, Michael Spierig, Peter Spierig
Genres: Horror, Thriller
Keywords drug addiction, haunted house, earthquake, based on true story, rifle, architecture, doctor, ghost, fictional biography, san jose, california
Production Companies Lionsgate, CBS Films, Screen Australia, Screen Queensland, Film Victoria, Blacklab Entertainment, Imagination Design Works, Eclipse Pictures
Box Office Revenue: $44,019,588
Budget: $3,500,000
Updates Updated: Feb 01, 2025
Entered: Apr 13, 2024
Trailers and Extras

Full Credits

Name Character
Jason Clarke Dr. Eric Price
Helen Mirren Sarah Winchester
Sarah Snook Marian Marriott
Finn Scicluna-O'Prey Henry Marriott
Emm Wiseman Nancy
Alana Fagan Partially Dressed Lady #1
Rebecca Makar Partially Dressed Lady #2
Tyler Coppin Arthur Gates
Michael Carman Frank
Angus Sampson John Hansen
Alice Chaston Clara
Eamon Farren Ben Block
Laura Brent Ruby Price
Adam Bowes Farmer Amputee
Bruce Spence Augustine
Phoenix Suhrou-Diamond Native American Child
Jayden Irving Carpenter #1
Rosco Campbell Carpenter #2
Puven Pather Carpenter #3
Tom Heath Wiry Carpenter
Curtis Bock Harry Block
Andy de Lore James Block
Graham Jahne Innocent Man #1
Hayden Stewart Innocent Man #2
Chris Anderson Innocent Man #3
Laura Sutton Innocent Woman
Robert Shook Police Officer #1
Richard Anastasios Police Officer #2
Will Jones Police Officer #3
Luke Maizey Police Officer #4
James Baldwin Police Officer #5
Neil Solomano Police Officer #6
Amos Ciza Slave Ghost
Red Horse Rivera Chief Little Fawn
Timothy Brown Ghost #1
Kym Lannin Ghost #2 - Farmer
Christian Rhodes-Wolfe Ghost #3 - Union Soldier
Albert Trajstman Ghost #4 - Sheriff
Xavier Gouault Ghost #5 - Police Officer
Gawi Deng Ghost #6 - Confederate Soldier
Ryuhei Tsukamoto Ghost #7 - Rail Worker
Shane Holloway Ghost #8 - Cowboy
Michael Boyd Ghost #9 - Sheriff
Elisa Abascal Ghost #10 - Mexican Woman
Akosia Sabet Ghost #11 - Cotton Picker
Stephanie Beall Ghost #12 - 1895 Wealthy Lady
Clancy Fraser Ghost #13 - Prostitute
Chris Homa Ghost #14 - Farmer's Wife
Rose Juan Ghost #15 - Maid
Douglas Embry Towns Person (uncredited)
Jeffrey W. Jenkins Footman (uncredited)
Dawayne Jordan Butler / Carpenter (uncredited)
Jeff Lipary Carpenter (uncredited)
Homero Lopez Carpenter (uncredited)
Marcus Orelias Carpenter (uncredited)
Name Job
Ben Nott Director of Photography
Leigh Pickford Casting
Mark Warren Art Direction
Vanessa Cerne Set Decoration
Lynn Wheeler Key Hair Stylist, Key Makeup Artist
Adam Hunt Sound Editor
Jamie Leslie First Assistant Director
Carmel Torcasio Script Supervisor
Cam Eason Boom Operator
Tom Vaughan Screenplay
Yvonne Collins Line Producer
Matt Villa Editor
Matthew Putland Production Design
Janie Parker Art Direction
Wendy Cork Costume Design
Hayden Collow Sound Designer
Laura Sutton Stunts
Frank Lipson Sound Designer
Angelique Badenoch Production Manager
Angella McPherson Second Assistant Director
Gretchen Thornburn Sound Recordist
Matt Slattery Gaffer
Michael Spierig Screenplay, Director
Peter Spierig Screenplay, Original Music Composer, Director
Philli Anderson Stunt Double
Chris Anderson Stunt Coordinator
Steven Boyle Makeup Effects Designer
Jonathan Haynes Second Assistant "B" Camera
Name Title
Tim McGahan Producer
Tobin Armbrust Executive Producer
Daniel Diamond Executive Producer
Antonia Lianos Executive Producer
Andrew Trapani Executive Producer
Michael Burton Executive Producer
Brett Tomberlin Producer
Benedict Carver Executive Producer
Brian J. Gilbert Executive Producer
Bryce Menzies Executive Producer
Marc Schipper Executive Producer
Simon Oakes Executive Producer
Organization Category Person
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 27 37 17
2024 5 31 61 18
2024 6 23 35 12
2024 7 25 42 14
2024 8 23 58 11
2024 9 16 22 12
2024 10 21 50 10
2024 11 18 27 11
2024 12 17 33 9
2025 1 17 28 10
2025 2 14 26 3
2025 3 6 18 1
2025 4 3 5 1
2025 5 2 6 1
2025 6 2 4 1
2025 7 1 2 1
2025 8 1 2 1
2025 9 2 3 1
2025 10 3 5 2

Trending Position


No trending metrics available.

Return to Top

Reviews

Ruuz
4.0

Given the cast assembled and the events it's based on, I'm sure you'll forgive me for having at least some expectations for _Winchester_. Whatever those expectations were though, I can tell you right now, they weren't met. _Winchester_ was massively disappointing, as by-the-numbers as you can get, a ... nd if it wasn't for a couple of good performances and the occasional decent effect, it would have literally nothing to offer. _Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._

Jun 23, 2021
FilipeManuelNeto
2.0

**A movie as empty as a haunted house.** I fully understand the fascination with Winchester Mystery House, an old mansion that was born from Sarah Winchester's will and ideas: owner of a fortune linked to the firearm's industry, she thought she was being haunted by the ghosts of people killed by ... these weapons and was advised by a medium to live in a mansion that was always being remodeled, with rooms and divisions permanently being added or demolished in an apparently random way. Sarah Winchester truly believed that she would be killed if she stopped or finished the building, so the house was only completed (obviously unended) with her death, and then opened to the public as a tourist attraction. It's a fascinating, curious and bizarre story, but it took a long time to reach the cinema. The movie, however, is not remarkable, being just another ghost story in a haunted house. The Spierig Brothers (directors and writers) do not bring anything new to their film, limiting themselves to using almost all the regular clichés of American horror, including static and scary images that appear out of nowhere (at quite predictable moments) for the usual jump scares. As a haunted house horror movie, I've seen better. One of the biggest problems of the film is the poor script and the bad conception of the characters. The two brothers who wrote the script were so enamored with the mysterious house that they weren't able to create a really intriguing story around it, and its original inhabitant. Everything goes reasonably well from the point where the doctor arrives at the mansion, but the preceding story, which justifies his trip and stay at the place, is very far-fetched. On the other hand, the melodramatic twist at the end, involving the doctor and a ghost from his past, was predictable from the beginning and is very nauseating. Poorly written and almost without personality, the characters just appear, talk and disappear without our caring about them. And as if the truth were not enough to make us believe in the possible curse of the Winchester family, the script got a completely made up story for Marion Marriott, niece (and heiress) of the manor owner. She existed in real life, but her life wasn't what the movie says, and her husband didn't die as it is said. It is a pointless and unnecessary invention. The cast has a handful of familiar names, but maybe they don't really want to be remembered for the work they've done here. In fact, the cast effort is reduced, and the prevailing feeling is that the actors were not really committed or motivated. If Helen Mirren is the most seasoned and famous actress in the cast, the truth is that she is never really there, in body and mind. She seems oblivious, or uninterested. Jason Clarke still seems to have some interest in what he's doing, and I felt the actor tried to do something positive, but he won't have had much of an opportunity to go beyond what he's done. The film is not a technical brilliance. There have been attempts to film in the original house, but we are told that the very design of the house, with cramped spaces and low light, will not be ideal for movie shooting. Personally, I also believe that the organization that is managing the property has shown some reluctance to allow it, since they have always had, until today, great restraint in allowing the capture of images of the interior of the house. Everything that was recreated in the studio seems to me to be very well done, and I liked the sets and the house. However, the production values ​​basically stop here… the cinematography is pretty basic and the editing is banal, but it manages to give the film a pace that isn't tiresome. The props and period details look convincing, but the CGI is poor, the digitally made images are of very poor quality, and the visual and sound effects seem cheap and elementary.

Jul 29, 2022