Menu
Cannibal Holocaust Poster

Cannibal Holocaust

They eat and they are eaten!
1980 | 96m | Italian

(65429 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 15 (history)

Details

A New York University professor returns from a rescue mission to the Amazon rainforest with the footage shot by a lost team of documentarians who were making a film about the area's local cannibal tribes.
Release Date: Feb 07, 1980
Director: Ruggero Deodato
Writer: Gianfranco Clerici
Genres: Horror
Keywords rape, adultery, movie business, culture clash, snake, leech, spider, swamp, ritual, pig, animal attack, vomit, amazon rainforest, controversy, film in film, tribe, jungle, human sacrifice, torture, rape and murder, brutality, cannibal, hatchet, south america, filmmaking, missing person, fake documentary, misogyny, ritual sacrifice, found footage, documentary filmmaking, tortoise, video nasty, lost footage, animal cruelty, amazon tribe, vomiting woman, abused woman, film within a film, adulterous wife, film censorship, film industry, guerilla filmmaking, banned film, disemboweling, film reel, yacomo
Production Companies Transcontinental Films, F.D. Cinematografica, Bolivariana Films, United Artists Europa
Box Office Revenue: $2,000,000
Budget: $100,000
Updates Updated: Jul 30, 2025
Entered: Mar 30, 2025
Trailers and Extras

More Like This

Full Credits

Name Character
Robert Kerman Professor Harold Monroe
Francesca Ciardi Faye Daniels
Perry Pirkanen Jack Anders
Luca Barbareschi Mark Tomaso
Salvatore Basile Chaco Losojos
Ricardo Fuentes Miguel Lujan
Carl Gabriel Yorke Alan Yates
Paolo Paoloni 1st Executive
Lionello Pio Di Savoia 2nd Executive
Luigina Rocchi
Mauricio Rodríguez
Ricardo Ramírez
Guillermo Bueno
William Sánchez
Ángel Manuel García
Edgardo Maza Anaya
Lucia Costantini Adulteress (uncredited)
Ruggero Deodato Man Sitting in NYU Campus (uncredited)
Enrico Papa Pantheon Interviewer (uncredited)
David Sage Alan's Father (uncredited)
Name Job
Ruggero Deodato Director
Massimo Giustini Makeup Artist
Riz Ortolani Original Music Composer
Sergio D'Offizi Director of Photography
Aldo Gasparri Special Effects
Gloria Jaramillo Assistant Director
Carlos Eduardo Uribe Assistant Director
Raul Montesanti Sound Engineer
Gianni D'Amico Sound Mixer
Umberto Montesanti Boom Operator
Vito Di Bari Production Secretary
Rossana Rocchi Continuity
Roberto Forges Davanzati Camera Operator
Enrico Maggi Assistant Camera
Lucia Costantini Wardrobe Designer
Giorgio Stegani Additional Dialogue
Vincenzo Tomassi Editor
Giovanni Masini Production Manager
Gianfranco Clerici Story, Screenplay
Massimo Antonello Geleng Production Design
Alberto Jiménez Ruiz Assistant Director
Lamberto Bava Assistant Director
Bruno Longobardo Sound Mixer
Luigi Pasqualini Electrician
Rita Antonelli Assistant Editor
Bill Williams Casting
Nicola Catalani Assistant Makeup Artist
Salvatore Basile Assistant Director
Paolo Cavicchioli Still Photographer
Ennio Brizzolari Key Grip
Rodolfo Ruzza Property Master
Name Title
Franco Di Nunzio Producer
Franco Palaggi Producer
Organization Category Person
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 43 64 31
2024 5 52 86 34
2024 6 46 81 28
2024 7 45 75 28
2024 8 39 67 27
2024 9 33 40 26
2024 10 40 74 27
2024 11 41 65 30
2024 12 40 71 25
2025 1 40 50 31
2025 2 30 39 10
2025 3 13 45 3
2025 4 7 10 4
2025 5 8 14 3
2025 6 7 10 5
2025 7 6 8 4
2025 8 6 9 4
2025 9 11 14 7
2025 10 15 15 14

Trending Position


Year Month High Avg
2025 10 583 640
Year Month High Avg
2025 9 524 779
Year Month High Avg
2025 8 783 910
Year Month High Avg
2025 3 759 834

Return to Top

Reviews

testr
7.0

"If hellholes like this didn't exist, I'm sure you would invent one" This film is almost, but not quite, exactly what the lurid title would suggest. It's definitely going for shocks as its primary source of horror, with a lot of this being truly hard to watch (I saw the uncut version, with animal ... cruelty intact, and I can see why they're cut from most versions, although there is a certain level of hypocrisy in condemning those scenes if you eat meat - and I doubt everyone who has ever criticised it were all vegetarian or vegan - unless you think that what goes on in slaughterhouses is any kinder that the animal slaughter depicted in this film, or that recording it somehow makes a moral difference), and has well earned its reputation for brutality. However, there's a deeper element to the horror. All the violence and cannibalism and rape is truly gruelling to sit through, but the scenes between those are, in their own way, just as grotesque. As strange as it may sound, one film that this strongly reminded me of was The Searchers, reminding us of the fact that so-called "primitive" peoples are separated from us only by circumstance, that there is nothing making the "civilised" world inherently better, that the wilderness is always right next door. Of course, this is rather problematic in itself. Because, in case the title didn't clue you in, this film has no interest in being sensitive. It is still exploitative. The question this film poses is more along the lines of "are we truly any better than nasty primitive violent cannibalistic tribes?", and certainly has far more in the way of contempt for civilisation than compassion for the supposedly "uncivilised". It's a common refrain by now; "Cannibal Holocaust claims to be satirising exploration while also being itself exploitative". This criticism... I understand it, but I feel it relies on a verbal sleight of hand. An "exploitation film" may contain the word "exploitation", but it is not the same as exploiting people. That said, we mustn't forget that the native actors in the film genuinely were mistreated. They weren't treated all that much better by the real film crew than by the in-movie one. Some of the stuff that happened on the set of this makes Kubrick-making-The-Shining look like the Buddha. There's no real way around it, the set of this movie was an abusive environment. The director of this movie, Ruggero Deodato, is an abusive arsehole who was particularly nasty to women and native actors. Fuck him. And yet, I still can't help but be fascinated by the film, even if I don't necessarily want to ever see it again. There is certainly some craft to this. From Riz Ortolani's beautiful score providing an actually effective counterpoint to the incredibly brutal scenes of horror to the raw documentary style that strips everything down to the most naked barbarism, this is a film that has an aesthetic you won't see in many others, at the very least. Even now "found footage" is as family a horror subgenre as "monster movie" or "slasher", this, along with Blair Witch, still holds up as something special. Sure, the framing device may be unorthodox in modern examples of the genre, but the bits that are in that style genuinely do feel like we're watching somebody's last moments on film. The acting is... variable, which sometimes breaks the illusion, but, perversely, it helps in a way that a lot of the cast seem genuinely uncomfortable, so don't HAVE to act for a lot of it. And yes, this is very influential. You can see all the familiar tropes of the found footage genre, right down to the cast being massive arseholes that you kinda want to see eaten by the end. Yes, as I say, the framing device is unorthodox, but it's not like there's no reason for it to be in the film or anything. It goes without saying that it would be a very different film without it, and probably wouldn't have nearly as many reviews on here. The footage story is of course where most of the scenes that fans of "extreme cinema" remember are from, but the frame story is part of the reason why this still an independent cult following outside of people who will simply watch anything with enough mutilation in it. The most targeted part, in my mind, comes when we see the footage of the in-film documentary "The Last Road to Hell", and the opening credits are in the same style as the actual opening credits to this film. But there comes a point if we have to ask how genuine this is? Is this film truly a critique of colonialism and exploitation, or is it just trying to make pretensions to something more than a schlocky cannibal flick? Is it just trying to make you feel less guilty for watching it, or more guilty? I don't think there are any easy answers. This is a wholly unattractive film, and knows it. The cruelty is both a means to and end and an end in itself simultaneously. All in all, Cannibal Holocaust isn't necessarily a film I can in any good concience recommend, because my God is it hard to watch, nor can I really say I'm even glad it exists, knowing what went on behind the scenes, but I can say the world of cinema would lose something tangible if this film were deleted from history. For better or for worse. OK, so today I've been writing various quick reviews-from-memory of various randomly selected movies I've seen before, and this was meant to be one of those, but ultimately this review turned out way longer than expected, so I hope I actually said anything worthwhile in that whole length rather than just rambling. Not sure why this of all films got the extended review for today, but I guess it is a film that sticks in your mind, and due to its nature it's not something many people are willing to see so it's easier to say things that haven't been said ten billion times already, so I guess the combination of those two factors resulted in me feeling I had the most to say about this one. Whatever the case, I hope I actually DID say something worthwhile lol.

Jul 15, 2022