Popularity: 2 (history)
Director: | Ken Loach |
---|---|
Writer: | Paul Laverty |
Staring: |
A middle aged carpenter, who requires state welfare after injuring himself, is joined by a single mother in a similar scenario. | |
Release Date: | Oct 21, 2016 |
---|---|
Director: | Ken Loach |
Writer: | Paul Laverty |
Genres: | Drama |
Keywords | heart attack, northern england, single mother, compassion, carpenter, social services, welfare, social realism, social security, healthcare, desperate, labor rights |
Production Companies | BBC Film, Why Not Productions, Wild Bunch, Les Films du Fleuve, BFI, Sixteen Films |
Box Office |
Revenue: $15,793,051
Budget: $0 |
Updates |
Updated: Feb 01, 2025 Entered: Apr 13, 2024 |
Name | Character |
---|---|
Dave Johns | Dan |
Hayley Squires | Katie |
Briana Shann | Daisy |
Dylan McKiernan | Dylan |
Kate Rutter | Ann |
Sharon Percy | Sheila |
Kema Sikazwe | China |
Magpie Richens | Piper |
Amanda Payne | Assessor |
Chris McGlade | At the Sawmill |
Shaun Prendergast | At the Sawmill |
Gavin Webster | At the Sawmill |
Sammy T. Dobson | Specialist Nurse |
Mickey Hutton | Neighbour With Dog |
Colin Coombs | Postman |
David Murray | Benefit Enquiry Line Advisor |
Stephen Clegg | Floor Manager |
Andy Kidd | Job Centre Guard |
Kay Gilchrist-Ward | Job Centre Officer Manager |
Dan Li | Stan Li |
Jane Birch | Librarian |
Kimberley Blair Smith | Student |
Junior Atilassi | Student |
John Sumner | C.V. Instructor |
Dave Turner | Harry Edwards |
Jackie Robinson | Food Bank |
Kathleen Germain | Food Bank |
Christine Wood | Food Bank |
Micky McGregor | Supermarket Guard Ivan |
Neil Stuart Morton | Supermarket Manager |
Roy McCartney | Decision Maker |
Stephen Halliday | Furniture Dealer |
Julie Nicholson | Business Woman |
Viktoria Kay | Woman in House |
Malcolm Shields | Scotsman |
Bryn Jones | Police |
Helen Dixon | Police |
Gary Jacques | Senior Police Officer |
Mick Laffey | Welfare Rights Officer |
Patricia Roberts | |
Yvonne Maher | |
Susan Robinson | |
Mike Milligan | Man at C.V. Meeting |
Laura Jane Barnes-Martin | |
Harriet Ghost | Appeal Receptionist |
Brian Scurr | |
James Hepworth | Shopper (uncredited) |
Natalie Ann Jamieson | Employment Support Allowance Assessor (uncredited) |
Rob Kirtley | Man in Food Bank (uncredited) |
Name | Job |
---|---|
Ken Loach | Director |
Robbie Ryan | Director of Photography |
Dominic Byles | Propmaker |
Paul Laverty | Screenplay |
Jonathan Morris | Editor |
Eimhear McMahon | Line Producer |
Kahleen Crawford | Casting |
Linda Wilson | Production Design |
Jo Slater | Costume Design |
Caroline Barton | Art Direction |
John Condron | Propmaker |
Benjamin James Davis | Art Department Assistant |
Ray Beckett | Production Sound Mixer |
Robert Brazier | Sound Effects Editor |
Andrew Caller | Sound Re-Recording Mixer |
Michael Clayton | Mix Technician |
Adam Scrivener | Sound Re-Recording Mixer |
John Skehill | Sound Mixer |
Neal Skillen | Boom Operator |
Dries Houben | Best Boy Electric |
Matt Fisher | Steadicam Operator, Camera Operator |
Simon Magee | Gaffer |
Ellen Pickering | Camera Intern |
Caroline Stewart | Casting Associate |
Alison Carter | Assistant Editor |
Courtney Moore | Production Coordinator |
Heather Storr | Script Supervisor |
Ben Brazier | Dialogue Editor, Foley Editor |
Gareth Spensley | Colorist |
François Tiberghien | Generator Operator |
Rowena Wilkinson | Foley Artist |
Sue Harding | Foley Artist |
Fergus Clegg | Production Design |
George Fenton | Original Music Composer |
Name | Title |
---|---|
Rebecca O'Brien | Producer |
Carole Baraton | Executive Producer |
Emmanuelle Castro | Executive Producer |
Philippe Logie | Associate Producer |
Organization | Category | Person | |
---|---|---|---|
Berlin International Film Festival | Best Supporting Actress | Hayley Squires | Nominated |
Cannes Film Festival | Best Picture | Ken Loach | Won |
Popularity History
Year | Month | Avg | Max | Min |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 4 | 18 | 27 | 11 |
2024 | 5 | 22 | 35 | 15 |
2024 | 6 | 19 | 28 | 12 |
2024 | 7 | 23 | 56 | 12 |
2024 | 8 | 13 | 23 | 8 |
2024 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 9 |
2024 | 10 | 16 | 30 | 7 |
2024 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 7 |
2024 | 12 | 13 | 19 | 10 |
2025 | 1 | 13 | 20 | 8 |
2025 | 2 | 9 | 14 | 3 |
2025 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 1 |
2025 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
2025 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
2025 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
2025 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
2025 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
2025 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
2025 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Trending Position
Year | Month | High | Avg |
---|---|---|---|
2025 | 5 | 911 | 911 |
Year | Month | High | Avg |
---|---|---|---|
2025 | 1 | 607 | 607 |
**A reminder that the society is made up of all kinds of people and some of them need gentle assistance.** There was an Oscar buzz for this. Many film experts thought it would sail through, but that did not happen. Now I saw it and I think it should have made into. If the priests' dirty secrets w ... ere recognised to condemn on such a big platform, then this film deserves as well. Because it reveals the cruelty against the economically weaker families and computer illiterate old men. It is only this much short to be called a documentary film. I mean it was very realistic with cinematic dialogues, otherwise a documentary. This is a message film, highlights what's wrong with our system and who are all suffering from it. The actors were great and the 80 years- old director had done a magnificent job. You could watch as many films you want, but if you fail to watch a film like this often, there no meaning getting into film watching business. The story follows a 60 year old widower whose name mentioned in the title. As he is recovering from heart attack and as advise given by his doctor, now he's out of the job and support allowance. Whenever he approaches the officials to look his issue, they always come up with different reasons to send him back disappointing. Especially not being into the computers, he struggles to fill forms on the internet platform. He's very patience and following everything they have told him to do. One day he comes to aid to a single mother with two kids who recently moved to the city from London, when she is too struggling in the employment agency to get a job. So their relationship grows as they lend hands to one another in tough times. Following, how they recover from the issues they are facing is what the film to cover in the remaining parts. > "Listen, you know, you give me a plot of land, I can build you a house. But I've never been anywhere near a computer." I liked this the film, but I think it was too realistic for my kind of taste. Because I like emotional parts and in this film those parts were highly effective, but not sentimentally striking way. Maybe you can say, less music with more dramatisation changed the storytelling style. Though the focus given on economically lower class and their way of life, not intentionally, but lack of support in society, all these were well detailed. I have always supported films that point outs flaws in basic establishment in society. Almost all the major struggling juncture one goes through in the employment agency, particularly if the person was old is uncovered. Like the telephone calls responding to the recorded message, online applications, as well as meeting them in person. What we're facing right now in the world is or to know is, not everybody is a computer literate. It'll be in the future, but not now. They are not getting proper help, particularly agency treating them like the illegal immigrants. In addition the film gets more interesting when a single mother was introduced. On the other side, different issues faced by poverty ridden small family, particularly her desperate attempt to fulfill the basic needs of her children is heartbreaking. This is not just the English problem, but everywhere else in the world. It had won several awards, particularly one BAFTA award. A good film for everyone, only if you understand the notion of the film or else will be a boring film. While I was watching it, I thought it was a regular kind drama, so I kept expecting that things would turn this and that way. For almost the entire film, but it's only in the final stage something it came up with to surprise me. So my advice is keep low expectation and be patience. More importantly accept what it reveals than what you want from it. If you fail on that, then its not your film and to know that the only way is to watch it. _7½/10_