Menu
I, Daniel Blake Poster

I, Daniel Blake

2016 | 100m | English

(67412 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 2 (history)

Director: Ken Loach
Writer: Paul Laverty
Staring:
Details

A middle aged carpenter, who requires state welfare after injuring himself, is joined by a single mother in a similar scenario.
Release Date: Oct 21, 2016
Director: Ken Loach
Writer: Paul Laverty
Genres: Drama
Keywords heart attack, northern england, single mother, compassion, carpenter, social services, welfare, social realism, social security, healthcare, desperate, labor rights
Production Companies BBC Film, Why Not Productions, Wild Bunch, Les Films du Fleuve, BFI, Sixteen Films
Box Office Revenue: $15,793,051
Budget: $0
Updates Updated: Feb 01, 2025
Entered: Apr 13, 2024
Trailers and Extras

Full Credits

Name Character
Dave Johns Dan
Hayley Squires Katie
Briana Shann Daisy
Dylan McKiernan Dylan
Kate Rutter Ann
Sharon Percy Sheila
Kema Sikazwe China
Magpie Richens Piper
Amanda Payne Assessor
Chris McGlade At the Sawmill
Shaun Prendergast At the Sawmill
Gavin Webster At the Sawmill
Sammy T. Dobson Specialist Nurse
Mickey Hutton Neighbour With Dog
Colin Coombs Postman
David Murray Benefit Enquiry Line Advisor
Stephen Clegg Floor Manager
Andy Kidd Job Centre Guard
Kay Gilchrist-Ward Job Centre Officer Manager
Dan Li Stan Li
Jane Birch Librarian
Kimberley Blair Smith Student
Junior Atilassi Student
John Sumner C.V. Instructor
Dave Turner Harry Edwards
Jackie Robinson Food Bank
Kathleen Germain Food Bank
Christine Wood Food Bank
Micky McGregor Supermarket Guard Ivan
Neil Stuart Morton Supermarket Manager
Roy McCartney Decision Maker
Stephen Halliday Furniture Dealer
Julie Nicholson Business Woman
Viktoria Kay Woman in House
Malcolm Shields Scotsman
Bryn Jones Police
Helen Dixon Police
Gary Jacques Senior Police Officer
Mick Laffey Welfare Rights Officer
Patricia Roberts
Yvonne Maher
Susan Robinson
Mike Milligan Man at C.V. Meeting
Laura Jane Barnes-Martin
Harriet Ghost Appeal Receptionist
Brian Scurr
James Hepworth Shopper (uncredited)
Natalie Ann Jamieson Employment Support Allowance Assessor (uncredited)
Rob Kirtley Man in Food Bank (uncredited)
Name Job
Ken Loach Director
Robbie Ryan Director of Photography
Dominic Byles Propmaker
Paul Laverty Screenplay
Jonathan Morris Editor
Eimhear McMahon Line Producer
Kahleen Crawford Casting
Linda Wilson Production Design
Jo Slater Costume Design
Caroline Barton Art Direction
John Condron Propmaker
Benjamin James Davis Art Department Assistant
Ray Beckett Production Sound Mixer
Robert Brazier Sound Effects Editor
Andrew Caller Sound Re-Recording Mixer
Michael Clayton Mix Technician
Adam Scrivener Sound Re-Recording Mixer
John Skehill Sound Mixer
Neal Skillen Boom Operator
Dries Houben Best Boy Electric
Matt Fisher Steadicam Operator, Camera Operator
Simon Magee Gaffer
Ellen Pickering Camera Intern
Caroline Stewart Casting Associate
Alison Carter Assistant Editor
Courtney Moore Production Coordinator
Heather Storr Script Supervisor
Ben Brazier Dialogue Editor, Foley Editor
Gareth Spensley Colorist
François Tiberghien Generator Operator
Rowena Wilkinson Foley Artist
Sue Harding Foley Artist
Fergus Clegg Production Design
George Fenton Original Music Composer
Name Title
Rebecca O'Brien Producer
Carole Baraton Executive Producer
Emmanuelle Castro Executive Producer
Philippe Logie Associate Producer
Organization Category Person
Berlin International Film Festival Best Supporting Actress Hayley Squires Nominated
Cannes Film Festival Best Picture Ken Loach Won
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 18 27 11
2024 5 22 35 15
2024 6 19 28 12
2024 7 23 56 12
2024 8 13 23 8
2024 9 13 22 9
2024 10 16 30 7
2024 11 12 19 7
2024 12 13 19 10
2025 1 13 20 8
2025 2 9 14 3
2025 3 5 16 1
2025 4 3 5 1
2025 5 2 6 1
2025 6 2 3 1
2025 7 1 2 1
2025 8 1 2 1
2025 9 2 4 1
2025 10 2 2 1

Trending Position


Year Month High Avg
2025 5 911 911
Year Month High Avg
2025 1 607 607

Return to Top

Reviews

Rangan
8.0

**A reminder that the society is made up of all kinds of people and some of them need gentle assistance.** There was an Oscar buzz for this. Many film experts thought it would sail through, but that did not happen. Now I saw it and I think it should have made into. If the priests' dirty secrets w ... ere recognised to condemn on such a big platform, then this film deserves as well. Because it reveals the cruelty against the economically weaker families and computer illiterate old men. It is only this much short to be called a documentary film. I mean it was very realistic with cinematic dialogues, otherwise a documentary. This is a message film, highlights what's wrong with our system and who are all suffering from it. The actors were great and the 80 years- old director had done a magnificent job. You could watch as many films you want, but if you fail to watch a film like this often, there no meaning getting into film watching business. The story follows a 60 year old widower whose name mentioned in the title. As he is recovering from heart attack and as advise given by his doctor, now he's out of the job and support allowance. Whenever he approaches the officials to look his issue, they always come up with different reasons to send him back disappointing. Especially not being into the computers, he struggles to fill forms on the internet platform. He's very patience and following everything they have told him to do. One day he comes to aid to a single mother with two kids who recently moved to the city from London, when she is too struggling in the employment agency to get a job. So their relationship grows as they lend hands to one another in tough times. Following, how they recover from the issues they are facing is what the film to cover in the remaining parts. > "Listen, you know, you give me a plot of land, I can build you a house. But I've never been anywhere near a computer." I liked this the film, but I think it was too realistic for my kind of taste. Because I like emotional parts and in this film those parts were highly effective, but not sentimentally striking way. Maybe you can say, less music with more dramatisation changed the storytelling style. Though the focus given on economically lower class and their way of life, not intentionally, but lack of support in society, all these were well detailed. I have always supported films that point outs flaws in basic establishment in society. Almost all the major struggling juncture one goes through in the employment agency, particularly if the person was old is uncovered. Like the telephone calls responding to the recorded message, online applications, as well as meeting them in person. What we're facing right now in the world is or to know is, not everybody is a computer literate. It'll be in the future, but not now. They are not getting proper help, particularly agency treating them like the illegal immigrants. In addition the film gets more interesting when a single mother was introduced. On the other side, different issues faced by poverty ridden small family, particularly her desperate attempt to fulfill the basic needs of her children is heartbreaking. This is not just the English problem, but everywhere else in the world. It had won several awards, particularly one BAFTA award. A good film for everyone, only if you understand the notion of the film or else will be a boring film. While I was watching it, I thought it was a regular kind drama, so I kept expecting that things would turn this and that way. For almost the entire film, but it's only in the final stage something it came up with to surprise me. So my advice is keep low expectation and be patience. More importantly accept what it reveals than what you want from it. If you fail on that, then its not your film and to know that the only way is to watch it. _7½/10_

May 16, 2024